Archive for December, 2008

Sayur Asem : Masakan Khas Berkhasiat

Siapa sangka, asam Jawa yang biasa kita pakai sebagai bumbu dapur, dan bahan pembuat jamu, ternyata memiliki khasiat yang lebih hebat dari yang pernah kita bayangkan. Si Asam hitam ini dapat membunuh asma, batuk, demam, rematik, borok,sampai menetralisir “bisa” gigitan ular. Asam jawa sering digunakan sebagai bumbu dapur untuk memasak

Sayur Asem Kandungan nutrisi dalam asam jawa yang cukup lengkap, semakin sempurna dengan hadirnya kacang panjang (sebagai anti kanker, kanker payudara, leukemia,antibakteri, antivirus, antioksidan, gangguan saluran kencing, peluruh kencing,batu ginjal, mencegah kelainan antibodi ,meningkatkan fungsi limpa, meningkatkan
penyatuan DNA dan RNA, meningkatkan fungsi sel darah merah, beri-beri, demam berdarah, kurang darah, sakit pinggang, rematik, pembengkakan, meningkatkan nafsu makan, dan sukar buang air besar), jagung manis (boleh untuk diabetesi),nangka (bijinya mempunyai kandungan protein setara kacang-kacangan), buah melinjo beserta daunnya yang terdapat dalam sayur asem.

Asam jawa memberi efek segar, oleh karena itu selain menjadi sayur sering pula kita jumpai dalam bentuk minuman (sari asem).
Buah polong asam jawa mengandung senyawa kimia antara lain asam appel, asam sitrat, asam anggur, asam tartrat, asam suksinat, pectin dan gula invert.

Buah asam jawa yang masak di pohon di antaranya mengandung nilai kalori sebesar 239 kal per 100 gram, protein 2,8 gram per 100 gram, lemak 0,6 gram per 100 gram,hidrat arang 62,5 gram per 100 gram, kalsium 74 miligram per 100 gram, fosfor 113 miligram per 100 gram, zat besi 0,6 miligram per 100 gram, vitamin A 30 SI per 100 gram, vitamin B1 0,34 miligram per 100 gram, vitamin C 2 miligram per 100 gram. Kulit bijinya mengandung phlobatannnin dan bijinya mengandung
albuminoid serta pati. Jadi, komplit bukan?

Beberapa penyakit yang dapat disembuhkan oleh asam ini adalah:

Asma
Batuk Kering
Demam
Sakit Panas
Reumatik
Sakit perut
Alergi/Biduren (Jawa)
Sariawan

Sumber : (iptek-cn02)

Semoga bermaanfaat.

Leave a Comment

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC); epidemiology, classification a

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic disease
of the liver and bile ducts that is frequently progressive and can lead to end-stage liver disease. The disease is characterized by progressive inflammation, fibrosis, and stricturing of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts. In the first part, epidemiology, classification and etiology has been discussed:

INTRODUCTION
Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic, cholestatic liver disease of unknown etiology, characterized by inflammation, destruction, and eventual fibrosis of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts which can lead to end-stage liver disease.

* Focal strictures of the biliary tree lead to cholestasis and a
characteristic beaded appearance on cholangiography.
* The disease may progress silently, or with recurrent episodes of
cholangitis characterized by right upper quadrant pain, fever, and jaundice.
* Insidious, but continuous, progression to cirrhosis with concomitant
portal hypertension and liver failure is typical.
* PSC is much less common than alcoholic liver disease; nonetheless, because it often affects otherwise healthy young people, it is the fourth most common indication for liver transplantation in the US
* Delbet first described the syndrome of PSC in 1924, the disease was
considered a rare medical curiosity with fewer than 100 cases reported up until 1970
* With the advent improved imaging techniques, particularly endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) in 1974, the numbers of cases diagnosed in most major centers increased.
* Mayo Clinic and Royal Free Hospital in London increased interest in the disease as it was quickly realized that the disorder had an association with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), more often affecting young males with ulcerative colitis.

EPIDEMIOLOGY
* In one study it was found that between the years 1976 and 2000 the incidence of PSC in men (1.25/100,000 person-years) was twice that of women (0.54/100,000 person-years).
* The prevalence of PSC, during the same time period, was three times greater in men (20.9/100,000 versus 6.3/100,000) than women. The same study confirmed the findings that 73% of cases have IBD, most of them ulcerative colitis.

* One of the reasons why the prevalence of this disease appears to be increasing is that the availability of diagnostic tests has increased.
* Many patients may simply have mildly increased liver enzymes and through thorough investigations be found to have PSC.
* The widespread implementation of ERCP and MRCP has likely led to a greater number of patients being diagnosed at an earlier stage of the disease, which has also contributed to an improved understanding of the disorder.

PSC and inflammatory bowel disease —
* UC has been reported in 25 to 90 percent of patients with PSC.
* A survey of 23 hospitals in Spain, for example, examined the reported cases of PSC from 1984 to 1988; UC was present in 44 percent.
* It is likely that this figure is an underestimate, since the colonic
mucosa may be grossly normal in appearance despite the presence of histologic colitis.
* The true prevalence of UC in PSC is probably closer to 90 percent when rectal and sigmoid biopsies are routinely obtained.

There are varying reports of the prevalence of PSC in UC.

* A survey of 1500 patients with UC in Sweden, for example, found that 72 (5 percent) had an elevated serum alkaline phosphatase; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed in 65, of whom 55 (85 percent) had evidence of PSC.
* PSC was more prevalent in patients with pancolitis than in those with distal colitis (5.5 versus 0.5 percent).
* It was also more common in men than women.
* Another report found that more than 7 percent of patients with UC may have PSC.

PSC also occurs in patients with Crohn’s disease.
* In one report of 262 patients with Crohn’s disease, 38 (15 percent) had long-standing abnormal liver biochemical tests and underwent endoscopic cholangiography and liver biopsy.
* Nine of these patients (3.4 percent) were diagnosed with PSC.

Gender —
* Approximately 70 percent of patients with PSC are men, with a mean age at diagnosis of 40 years, even though the sex distribution is equal between men and women in the overall UC population.
* However, in the small subset of patients without UC, the male:female ratio is lower (0.8:1) and patients are diagnosed at an older age.
* Women with PSC are generally diagnosed at an older age.

CLASSIFICATION
The early classifications of PSC were very rigid and excluded patients with gallstones, previous biliary tract surgery, inflammatory bowel disease, and retroperitoneal fibrosis.

* Additionally, progression of disease over a 2-year time period was
mandatory prior to the diagnosis.
* These strict criteria seem unjustified and present classification schemes divide sclerosing cholangitis into

o primary (of unknown etiology) and
o secondary (with a known or suspected underlying cause).

Criteria for the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Source: Porayko et al.

1. Presence of typical cholangiographic abnormalities of PSC (involving bile ducts segmentally or extensively)
2. Compatible clinical, biochemical, and hepatic histologic findings
(recognizing that they are nonspecific)
3. Exclude the following in most instances.

* Biliary calculi (unless related to stasis)
* Biliary tract surgery (other than simple cholecystectomy)
* Congenital abnormalities of the biliary tract
* AIDS-associated cholangiopathy
* Ischemic strictures
* Bile duct neoplasms (unless PSC previously established)
* Exposure to irritant chemicals (fl oxuridine, formalin)
* Evidence of another type of liver disease, such as primary biliary
cirrhosis or chonic active hepatitis.

Since the majority of patients with PSC have IBD, patients can be further classified as those with associated inflammatory bowel disease and those without

The most common secondary causes of sclerosing cholangitis include

* ischemia (arising from operative trauma, hepatic arterial infusion of
floxuridine, allograft rejection),
* recurrent biliary sepsis,
* multifocal cholangiocarcinoma,
* AIDS, and
* toxic agents (formaldehyde, absolute alcohol).

Radiographically, secondary causes of sclerosing cholangitis simulate PSC but the clinical course and therapeutic options may differ considerably.

Caroli and Rosner developed an anatomical classification in which the condition is divided according to whether involvement of the biliary tree is diffuse or segmental.

* Segmental involvement could further be divided into disease that affects the hepatic duct junction, the common hepatic duct, or the common bile duct.

Longmire’s classification of primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Source: Longmire.

Type Frequency Clinical/radiological features (%)

Type -1 5–10% Affecting primarily distal common bile duct

Type -2 5–10% Occurring soon after attack of acute necrotizing cholangitis

Type -3 40–50% Chronic diffuse

Type -4 40–50% Chronic diffuse associated with inflammatory bowel disease

Type of duct/ Cholangiographic appearance classification
Intrahepatic
Type I Multiple strictures, normal caliber of bile ducts
Type II Multiple strictures, saccular dilations, decreased arborization
Type III Only central branches filled, severe pruning

Extrahepatic
Type I Slight irregularity of duct contour, no stricture
Type II Segmental stricture
Type III Stricture of almost the entire length of the duct
Type IV Extremely irregular margin, diverticulum outpouchings.

The classic onion-skin lesions are rarely seen on percutaneous biopsy of the liver; therefore, the diagnosis has usually been made through cholangiography.

Histologically, PSC tends to gradually progress through four reasonably
well-characterized stages.

Stage 1 is the earliest, characterized by degeneration of epithelial cells in the bile duct and an inflammatory infiltrate localized to the portal triads. In stage 2, fibrosis and inflammation infiltrate the hepatic parenchyma with subsequent destruction of periportal hepatocytes resulting in piecemeal necrosis and loss of bile ducts.
In stage 3, cholestasis becomes more prominent and portal-to-portal fibrotic septa are characteristic.
In stage 4, frank cirrhosis develops, with histological features similar to
other causes of cirrhosis.

Associated disorders
The most common association is with inflammatory bowel disease, which affects up to 75% of patients with PSC.

* Of these patients, over 80% have ulcerative colitis (UC) and less than 20% have Crohn’s disease.
* Conversely, only 2.5 to 7.5% of patients with UC have or will develop PSC.
* The true prevalence is likely much higher, but because many patients with UC are asymptomatic and show only minimal elevation in liver enzymes,cholangiography is not performed and they may remain undiagnosed.

Many other disorders, particularly inflammatory disorders, show an association with PSC. These include

* hypereosinophilic syndrome,
* Sjögren’s syndrome,
* systemic sclerosis,
* celiac disease,
* pancreatitis,
* Behçet’s syndrome,
* histiocytosis X,
* sarcoidosis,
* sicca complex,
* rheumatoid arthritis,
* systemic mastocytosis,
* histiocytosis X, and
* Reidel’s thyroiditis.

PATHOGENESIS —
The cause of PSC is unknown, and multiple mechanisms are likely to play a role.

* The tight association between PSC and UC (a known autoimmune disease) suggests an autoimmune process. However, other mechanisms are likely to be important since only a minority of patients with UC have PSC.

* An inflammatory reaction in the liver and bile ducts may be induced by chronic or recurrent entry of bacteria into the portal circulation. Liver damage may also result from the accumulation of toxic bile acids that are abnormally produced by colonic bacteria or chronic viral infection.

* Ischemic damage to the bile ducts may occur.

Although the relationship between PSC and UC suggests a possible common pathogenesis, the two disorders may occur at different times. PSC may develop years after colectomy for UC, and UC may first present after liver transplantation has been performed for PSC.

Given the close association of PSC with ulcerative colitis, early investigators postulated that recurrent portal bacteremia might be an important factor in the development of the disorder.

* Recurrent portal infection could lead to chronic biliary tract infection,inflammation, and subsequent fibrosis and classical stricture formation.
* One study even found that portal bacteremia was present in patients who had colonic surgery.
* Subsequent studies, however, could not confirm the findings of portal vein phlebitis.
* Furthermore, if recurrent colitis leads to portal vein phlebitis,
colectomy (or at least controlled colonic disease) should have a protective effect.

o This has not been demonstrated to be true.
* Additionally, hepatic histology does not support portal venous infection since the hallmark of this disorder, portal phlebitis, is mild or absent in most patients with PSC.
* Thus, there is little evidence to support the colonic-bacterial infection hypothesis.

If portal bacteremia from a colonic source is not a critical factor, then toxins that might be released from a diseased colon could be suspect.

* Theoretically, toxic bile acids such as lithocholic acid, which arise from bacterial activity within the colon, can be absorbed through a diseased colon with its increased mucosal permeability.
* Lithocholic acid is formed from chenodeoxycholic acid by bacterial
7-α- dehydroxylation in the colon, and it has even been shown to be hepatotoxic in animals.

o Unfortunately, abnormalities in bile acid metabolism in PSC or UC
patients have not been demonstrated.
o Furthermore, in human tissue, lithocholic acid is rapidly sulfated
and rendered nontoxic, a process which does not occur in animal models.

* Other toxic substances that have been considered more recently are
N-formylated chemotactic peptides,

o produced by enteric flora,
o which have been shown in animal studies to induce fibrosis and
damage to major bile ducts through colonic absorption and enterohepatic circulation.
o Increased biliary excretion of these peptides has been shown in
experimentally induced colitis in animal models.
o Further investigation to delineate the role of these peptides in the
etiology of PSC is required.

The major criticism of the theories of colonic toxins causing PSC comes from studies looking at the natural history of the disorder.

* It has been demonstrated that the severity of the colitis bears little
relation to the development or severity of PSC.
* Furthermore, patients who have a colectomy show no change in their PSC natural history.
* Some patients develop PSC years after a colectomy or even prior to the onset of their colitis.
* Some patients who develop PSC never even have inflammatory bowel disease.

Antibiotics (which cold, theoretically, alter the colonic flora) appear to have little effect on the natural history of PSC. Because of these findings, colonic toxins are likely to play only a minor role, if any, in the overall etiology of PSC.

The association of appendectomy with IBD is an interesting one.

* Appendectomy has been demonstrated to have some interesting associations with UC and UC-associated PSC.
* In a case–control study in Australia, patients with PSC/UC, PSC alone, and UC were matched to controls in regards to the effects of appendectomy and smoking, and PSC in regards to disease onset, severity, and extent.
* Appendectomy rates in PSC patients were no different from controls;
however, the appendectomy rates in those with UC were four times less than controls, suggesting a protective effect of appendectomy in this patient population.
* Additionally, those patients with appendectomy in both PSC and UC groups resulted in a 5- year delay in onset of either intestinal or biliary symptoms.

Abnormalities of copper metabolism have also been implicated in the pathogenesis of PSC.

* Several authors have noted that liver samples from patients with PSC show an excess of hepatic copper, which is known to be hepatotoxic.
* However,unlike other disorders with excessive copper deposition, treatment with chelating agents (penicillamine), has not been shown to have any benefit.
* Likely, as with many cholestatic disorders, copper accumulation is the result of poor biliary excretion, rather than a primary inciting event critical
to the pathogenesis of the disorder.

Chronic infection of the biliary tree has been implicated in the pathogenesis of PSC through several observations.

* Longmire,who noted that some patients appear to develop PSC after an initial episode of acute necrotizing cholangitis, classified this group as a separate category (type 2) of PSC.

Patients with acquired immuno deficiency syndrome (AIDS) have been noted to have a sclerosing cholangitis that is felt to be caused by opportunistic infection (i.e. cytomegalovirus, cryptosporidium).

* Unfortunately,an extensive investigation of 37 PSC patients showed
evidence of cytomegalovirus (polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of liver tissue) in only one patient.
* Although reversibility of sclerosing disease in an infectious environment has been demonstrated in immunocompromised patients who have the underlying infection treated, this has not been demonstrated in normal hosts who have a fully functional immune system.

Experimental cholangitis and biliary atresia can be induced in animal models through infection with Reovirus type 3.

* Early reports suggested that patients with PSC had a significant increase in antibody titers to this virus compared to controls.
* More recent data, however, show no difference in prevalence or titers of Reovirus between controls and PSC patients.

Rubella can also cause an obliterative cholangitis of the intrahepatic ducts in the fetus, although the histological picture differs from that of PSC. Despite these negative studies, an infectious etiological agent that alters antigenic determinants has yet to be excluded in PSC.

Immune activation —
There are multiple lines of evidence supporting an immunopathogenic cause for PSC. A number of abnormalities in humoral immunity have been described in these patients:

* Up to 50 percent have an elevated IgM level, and some may also have an increased IgG fraction.
* Autoantibodies are frequently present in patients with PSC, with titers in the range associated with autoimmune hepatitis. The most common are antismooth muscle antibodies and antinuclear antibodies, which are found in approximately 75 percent of patients
* Antibodies directed against cytoplasmic and nuclear antigens of
neutrophils with a characteristic perinuclear staining pattern (P-ANCA) are found in up to 80 percent of adults with PSC.
* The antibodies appear to be directed against a myeloid 50 kilodalton
nuclear envelope protein, not myeloperoxidase as in typical P-ANCA antibodies. In one report, P-ANCA had a 100 percent specificity for PSC compared to controls with other liver diseases; P-ANCA is also found in 25 to 30 percent of unaffected first degree family members of patients with PSC. P-ANCA has also been identified in children with PSC but not in those with UC alone.
* These antibodies are not related to the presence or absence of UC.

Abnormalities of the cellular immune response have also been described in patients with PSC:

* There are conflicting data reporting either an increase or decrease in the total number of circulating T cells; however, the number of CD4 positive T-cells in the liver is increased.
* Bile duct epithelial cells in PSC may be targets for immune-mediated
attack by T cells.
* The bile duct cells in PSC express antigens which cross-react with colonic epithelial cells.
* Bile duct cells aberrantly express HLA class II antigens, and ICAM
(intercellular adhesion molecule)-1 is expressed by ductular epithelial cells.

Genetic factors —
* There may be a genetic predisposition to PSC since these patients have an increased prevalence of HLA-B8, -DR3, and -DRw52a .
* One study, for example found that HLA DRw52a was present in 100 percent of patients with PSC.
* Subsequent reports, however, have only found a 50 percent prevalence of this haplotype.
* Both HLA-DRw52a and -DR4, which occurs less frequently, appear to increase the risk for severe or progressive disease.

Ischemic ductal injury —
* Ischemic injury to the bile ducts results in a clinical, biochemical, and cholangiographic picture similar to PSC.
* Intraarterial infusion of floxuridine also results in a comparable
appearance.
* Thus, it is possible that ischemic injury to peribiliary arterioles and
capillaries may be involved in the pathogenesis of PSC.
* However, there are no data to support this hypothesis, or to demonstrate that hepatic or biliary blood flow is deficient in patients with this disorder.

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator mutations —

* Because of the radiologic and histologic similarities between PSC and
cystic fibrosis, mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) have been sought in patients with PSC.
* One preliminary study suggested that a subset of patients with PSC had evidence of CFTR-mediated ion transport dysfunction; affected patients had a chloride secretory response intermediate between patients with cystic fibrosis and controls.

Dr. Jitendra Agrawal, Kanpur, India.

Leave a Comment

Contact lens

A contact lens also known simply as a contact is a corrective, cosmetic, or therapeutic lens usually placed on the cornea of the eye. Modern soft contact lenses were invented by the Czech chemist Otto Wichterle, who also invented the first gel used for their Production.

Contact lenses usually serve the same corrective purpose as conventional glasses, but are lightweight and virtually invisible—many commercial lenses are tinted a faint blue to make them more visible when immersed in cleaning and storage solutions. Some cosmetic lenses are deliberately colored to alter the appearance of the eye.

It has been estimated that million people use contact lenses worldwide %,including to million in the United Statesand million in Japan. The types of lenses used and prescribed vary markedly between countries, with rigid lenses accounting for over % of currentlyprescribed lenses in Japan, Netherlands and Germany but less than % in Scandinavia.People choose to wear contact lenses for
various reasons.

Many consider their appearance to be more attractive with contact lenses than with glasses. Contact lenses are less affected by wet
weather, do not steam up, and provide a wider field of vision. They are more suitable for a number of sporting activities. Additionally, ophthalmological conditions such as keratoconus and aniseikonia may not be accurately corrected with glasses.

History
Leonardo da Vinci is frequently credited with introducing the general principle of contact lenses in his Codex of the eye, Manual D, where he described a method of directly altering corneal power by submerging the eye in a bowl of water. Leonardo, however, did not suggest his idea be used for correcting vision — he was more interested in learning about the mechanisms of accommodation of
the eye.

René Descartes proposed another idea in , in which a glass tube filled
with liquid is placed in direct contact with the cornea. The protruding end was to be composed of clear glass, shaped to correct vision however the idea was impracticable, since it would make blinking impossible.

In , while conducting experiments concerning the mechanisms of accommodation, scientist Thomas Young constructed a liquidfilled eyecup which could be considered a predecessor to the contact lens. On the eyecups base, Young fitted a microscope eyepiece. However,
like Leonardos, Youngs device was not intended to correct refraction errors.

Sir John Herschel, in a footnote of the edition of the Encyclopedia
Metropolitana, posed two ideas for the visual correction the first a spherical capsule of glass filled with animal jelly, and a mould of the cornea which could be impressed on some sort of transparent medium.

Though Herschel reportedly never tested these ideas, they were both later advanced by several independent inventors such as Hungarian Dr. Dallos , who perfected a method of making molds from living eyes. This enabled the manufacture of lenses that, for the first time, conformed to the actual shape of the eye.It was not until that a German glassblower, F.E. Muller, produced the first eye covering to be seen through and tolerated. In the next year, the German physiologist Adolf Eugen Fick constructed and fitted the first successful contact lens.

While working in Zürich, he described fabricating afocal scleral contact shells, which rested on the less sensitive rim of tissue around the cornea, and experimentally fitting them initially on rabbits, then on himself, and lastly on a small group of volunteers. These lenses were made from heavy brown glass and were –mm in diameter. Fick filled the empty space between corneacallosity and glass with a dextrose solution. He published his work, Contactbrille, in the journal Archiv
für Augenheilkunde in March .

Overview
Ficks lens was large, unwieldy, and could only be worn for a few hours at a time. August Müller in Kiel, Germany, corrected his own severe myopia with a more convenient glassblown scleral contact lens of his own manufacture in .Also in , Louis J. Girard invented a similar scleral form of contact lens.Glassblown scleral lenses remained the only form of contact lens until the s when polymethyl methacrylate PMMA or PerspexPlexiglas was developed, allowing plastic scleral lenses to be manufactured for the first time. In , optometrist William Feinbloom introduced plastic lenses, making them lighter and more convenient.

These lenses were a combination of glass and plastic.In , the first corneal lenses were developed. These were much smaller than the original scleral lenses,as they sat only on the cornea rather than across all of the visible ocular surface, and could be worn up to sixteen hours per day. PMMA corneal lenses became the first contact lenses to have mass appeal through the s, as lens designs became more sophisticated with improving manufacturing lathe technology.

One important disadvantage of PMMA lenses is that no oxygen is transmitted through the lens to the conjunctiva and cornea, which can cause a number of adverse clinical effects. By the end of the s, and through the s and s, a range of oxygenpermeable but rigid materials were developed to overcome this problem.

Collectively, these polymers are referred to as rigid gas permeable or RGP materials or lenses. Although all the above lens types — sclerals, PMMA lenses and RGPs — could be correctly referred to as being hard or rigid, the term hard is now used to refer to the original PMMA lenses which are still occasionally fitted and worn, whereas rigid is a generic term which can be used for all these lens types. That is, hard lenses PMMA lenses are a subset of rigid lenses.

Occasionally, the term gas permeable is used to describe RGP lenses, but this is potentially misleading, as soft lenses are also gas permeable in that they allow oxygen to move through the lens to the ocular surface.

Demo
The principal breakthrough in soft lenses was made by the Czech chemist Otto Wichterle who published his work Hydrophilic gels for biological use in the journal Nature in . This led to the launch of the first soft hydrogel lenses in some countries in the s and the first approval of the Soflens material by the United States Food and Drug Administration FDA in .

These lenses were soon prescribed more often than rigid lenses, mainly due to the immediate comfort of soft lenses by comparison, rigid lenses require a period of adaptation before full comfort is achieved. The polymers from which soft lenses are manufactured
improved over the next years, primarily in terms of increasing the oxygen permeability by varying the ingredients making up the polymers.

In , an important development was the launch of the first silicone hydrogels onto the market. These new materials encapsulated the benefits of silicone — which has extremely high oxygen permeability — with the comfort and clinical performance of the conventional hydrogels which had been used for the previous years.

These lenses were initially advocated primarily for extended overnight
wear although more recently, daily no overnight wear silicone hydrogels have been launched.Later work that used these ChromaGen lenses with dyslexics in a randomised, doubleblind, placebo controlled trial showed highly significant improvements in reading ability over reading without the lenses This system has been granted FDA approval in the United States, which is reassuring to patients.

Corrective contact lenses
A corrective contact lens is a lens designed to improve vision. In many people, there is a mismatch between the refractive power of the eye and the length of the eye, leading to a refraction error. A contact lens neutralizes this mismatch and allows for correct focusing of light onto the retina. Conditions correctable with contact lenses include near or short sightedness myopia, far or long sightedness hypermetropia, astigmatism and presbyopia.

Contact wearers must usually take their contacts out every night or every few days, depending on the brand and style of the contact. Recently there has been renewed interest in orthokeratology, the correction of myopia by deliberate overnight flattening of the cornea, leaving the eye without contact lens or eyeglasses correction during
the day.

For those with certain color deficiencies, a redtinted XChrom contact lens may be used. Although the lens does not restore normal color vision, it allows some colorblind individuals to distinguish colors better.ChromaGen lenses have been used and these have been shown to have some limitations with vision at night although otherwise producing significant improvements in colour vision.

An earlier study showed very significant improvements in colour vision and patient satisfactionA cosmetic contact lens is designed to change the appearance of the eye. These lenses may also correct the vision, but some blurring or obstruction of vision may occur as a result of the color or design. In the United States,the FDA frequently calls noncorrective cosmetic contact lenses decorative contact lenses.

Cosmetic contact lenses
Theatrical contact lenses are a type of cosmetic contact lens that are used primarily in the entertainment industry to make the eye appear pleasing, unusual or unnatural in appearance, most often in horror and zombie movies, where lenses can make ones eyes appear demonic, cloudy and lifeless, or even to make the pupils of the wearer appear dilated to simulate the natural appearance of the pupils under the influence of various illicit drugs.

Scleral lenses cover the white part of the eye i.e. sclera and are used in many theatrical lenses.. Due to their size, these lenses are difficult to insert and do not move very well within the eye. They may also hamper the vision as the lens has a small area for the user to see through. As a result they generally cannot be worn for more than hours as they can cause temporary vision disturbances.

Similar lenses have more direct medical applications. For example, some lenses can give the iris an enlarged appearance, or mask defects such as absence aniridia or damage dyscoria to the iris. Although many brands of contact lenses are lightly tinted to make them easier to handle, cosmetic lenses worn to change the color of the eye are far less common, accounting for only % of contact lens
fits in .

Soft lenses are often used in the treatment and management of
nonrefractive disorders of the eye. A bandage contact lens protects an injured or diseased cornea from the constant rubbing of blinking eyelids thereby allowing it to heal. They are used in the treatment of conditions including bullous keratopathy, dry eyes, corneal ulcers and erosion, keratitis, corneal edema, descemetocele, corneal ectasis, Moorens ulcer, anterior corneal dystrophy, and neurotrophic keratoconjunctivitis. Contact lenses that deliver drugs to the eye have also been developed.

By constructional material
The first contact lenses were made of glass, which caused eye irritation, and were not wearable for extended periods of time. But when William Feinbloom introduced lenses made from polymethyl methacrylate PMMA or PerspexPlexiglas,contacts became much more convenient.

These PMMA lenses are commonly referred to as hard lenses this term is not used for other types of contacts.However, PMMA lenses have their own side effects no oxygen is transmitted through the lens to the cornea, which can cause a number of adverse clinical events. In the late s,and through the s and s, improved rigid materials — which were also oxygenpermeable — were developed. Collectively, these polymers are referred to as rigid gas permeable or RGP materials or lenses. One advantage of hard lenses is that, due to their nonporous nature, they do not absorb chemicals or fumes.

The absorption of such compounds by other types of contacts can be a problem for
those who are routinely exposed to painting or other chemical processes.

Rigid lenses offer a number of unique properties. In effect, the lens is able to replace the natural shape of the cornea with a new refracting surface. This means that a regular spherical rigid contact lens can provide good level of vision in people who have astigmatism or distorted corneal shapes as with keratoconus.While rigid lenses have been around for about years, soft lenses are a much more recent development.

The principal breakthrough in soft lenses made by Otto Wichterle led to the launch of the first soft hydrogel lenses in some countries in the s and the approval of the Soflens material polymacon bythe United States FDA in . Soft lenses are immediately comfortable, while rigid
lenses require a period of adaptation before full comfort is achieved.

The polymers from which soft lenses are manufactured improved over the next years,primarily in terms of increasing the oxygen permeability by varying the ingredients making up the polymers.

Record
A small number of hybrid rigidsoft lenses exist. An alternative technique is piggybacking of contact lenses, a smaller, rigid lens being mounted atop a larger, soft lens. This is done for a variety of clinical situations where a single lens will not provide the optical power, fitting characteristics, or comfort required.In , silicone hydrogels became available. Silicone hydrogels have both the extremely high oxygen permeability of silicone and the comfort and clinical performance of the conventional hydrogels.

These lenses were initially advocated primarily for extended overnight wear, although more recently daily no overnight wear silicone hydrogels have been launched. While it provides the oxygen permeability, the silicone also makes the lens surface highly hydrophobic and less wettable.

This frequently results in discomfort and dryness during lens wear. In order to compensate for the hydrophobicity, hydrogels are added hence the name silicone hydrogels to make the lenses more hydrophilic. However the lens surface may still remain hydrophobic.

Hence some of the lenses undergo surface modification processes
which cover the hydrophobic sites of silicone. Some other lens types incorporate internal rewetting agents to make the lens surface hydrophilic.

Leave a Comment

Older Posts »